<p rend="Plain Text">Envoys sent to <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a> from Asia (161/0)</p>
<p rend="Plain Text">This excerpt from de legat. gent. is taken from the res Asiae of Ol. 154, 4 = 161/0; see p. 36. Cf. Diod. xxxi. 28.</p>
Specifics
31.32.1 - 31.32.1
<p rend="Plain Text">
<emph rend="bold"><w lang="el-GR">Προυσίας . . . μετὰ Γαλατῶν</w>:</emph>
for an earlier embassy sent to <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a>, to complain about Eumenes see 1. 3 n., xxx. 30. 2 n. (165/4). Meanwhile Eumenes had been aiding Attis, the high priest at Pessinus, against the Galatians, and Prusias' present complaints probably concerned this. For inscriptions recording correspondence between Eumenes II and Attalus II and Attis see xxi. 37. 5 n.; Welles, nos. 55–61; OGIS, 315; Sthelin, 82; Hansen
<emph rend="superscript">2</emph>
, 126; Habicht, RE, 'Prusias II (2)', cols. 1114–15. These show that, despite the Senate's decision to grant independence to <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Galatia&groupId=596&placeId=385">Galatia</a> (xxx. 28 n.), Eumenes had intrigued there, and Prusias had been active in the area against him.
</p>
31.32.2 - 31.32.2
<p rend="Plain Text">
<emph rend="bold"><w lang="el-GR">Ἄτταλον</w>:</emph>
cf. 1. 2 n. Attalus had probably already been designated co-ruler by Eumenes. Syll. 671 and 672 are Delphic decrees dated to the archonship of Amphistratus (160/59; the date 159/8 in Manni, Fasti, 77–78 n. 3, neglects the relationship between the inscriptions of Amphistratus and those of Emmenidas, as described by Daux, 122), which show that Attalus was already king early in 159, and Eumenes was still alive three months later (cf. Daux, 502–3, 686, 690; Hansen
<emph rend="superscript">2</emph>
, 127); and IG, ii
<emph rend="superscript">2</emph>
. 953 shows Eumenes entrusting the government to someone who is almost certainly Attalus in the Attic year 161/0 (Dinsmoor, Archons, 260; Hansen
<emph rend="superscript">2</emph>
, 127).
</p>
31.32.3 - 31.32.3
<p rend="Plain Text">
<emph rend="bold"><w lang="el-GR">Ἀριαράθης</w>:</emph>
on Ariarathes V of <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Cappadocia&groupId=435&placeId=343">Cappadocia</a> see 3. 1 n.
</p>
<p rend="Plain Text">
<emph rend="bold"><w lang="el-GR">τῇ . . . Ῥώμῃ στέφανον . . . ἔπεμψε</w>:</emph>
the 'crown' (cf. xx. 12. 5 n.) was of 10,000 gold staters (not 1,000, as Paton). For the sending of 'crowns' to <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a> see xxx. 5. 4 n.; and for a statue of the populus Romanus (with which <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a> is perhaps here equated) cf. 4. 4 n. Since a gold stater was worth 20 Attic silver drachmae, this 'crown' was worth over 33 talents.
</p>
<p rend="Plain Text">
<emph rend="bold"><w lang="el-GR">τὴν πρὸς τὸν Τεβέριον ἀπάντησιν αὐτοῦ</w>:</emph>
the embassy of Ti. Gracchus had been sent to Asia after Demetrius' escape in 162 (cf. 15. 9 n.); its duties included looking into the sentiments of the other kings and their relations with the Galatians. P.'s account of Gracchus' meeting with Ariarathes has not survived (33. 1); it will not have taken place before 161 (since the envoys had business in Greece before going on to Asia: 15. 10), and was more likely in 160 (see 33. 1 n.). According to Diod. xxxi. 28 (cf. xxxii. 1. 2 n.) Ariarathes had agreed to abandon a proposed marriage alliance with Demetrius I (cf. Iustin. xxxv. 1. 2) and to break off friendship with him. On the arrival of Ariarathes' embassy at <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a>, and the granting of an audience to it this same autumn (160) see xxxii. 1. 1–3.
<milestone unit="page" n="516">[516]</milestone>
</p>
Walbank Commentary