<head>VII. Affairs of Italy</head><head>Embassies from Prusias, <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rhodes&groupId=931&placeId=1665">Rhodes</a>, and Achaea</head>Many other embassies also reached <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a> this year, the principal ones being that under Astymedes from <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rhodes&groupId=931&placeId=1665">Rhodes</a>, that from the Achaeans consisting of Eureas, Anaxidamus and Satyrus, and that from Prusias headed by Python.
The senate gave audiences to all these. The envoys from Prusias complained of King Eumenes, asserting that he had annexed some Bithynian places, and did not by any means cease from meddling with <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Galatia&groupId=596&placeId=385">Galatia</a>,
but disobeyed the decrees of the senate, continuing to strengthen his own partisans there and to weaken by every means in his power those who were favourable to <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a>, and who desired to act in accordance with the decrees of the senate.
There were also some envoys from Asiatic cities who accused Eumenes, laying stress on his understanding with Antiochus.
The senate, after listening to the accusations, neither repelled them nor pronounced any opinion, but took note of them, generally distrusting Eumenes and Antiochus.
As for the Galatians they continued to add to and further secure their liberties.
Tiberius and his colleagues, on returning from their mission, were incapable of forming themselves or stating to the senate any opinion about Eumenes and Antiochus further than that which they had formerly entertained when in <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a>.
So well had the kings succeeded in relaxing their vigour by the warmth of their reception.
Walbank Commentary