<head>VIII. Affairs of <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Macedonia&groupId=723&placeId=428">Macedonia</a> and Greece</head>From this time forward dates the commencement of the catastrophes that were fatal to the royal house of Macedon.
I am not indeed unaware that some of the authors who have written about the war of the Romans with Perseus, wishing to indicate the causes of the quarrel, attribute it first to the expulsion of Abrupolis from his principality on the pretext that he had overrun the mines on Mount Pangaeus after the death of Philip,
upon which Perseus, coming to protect them and having utterly routed him, expelled him, as I said, from his principality.
The next cause they give is the invasion of Dolopia by Perseus and his coming to <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Delphi&groupId=534&placeId=363">Delphi</a>, and further the plot formed at <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Delphi&groupId=534&placeId=363">Delphi</a> against King Eumenes, and the killing of the envoys from Boeotia, these latter events being asserted by some to have been the causes of the war.
Now I maintain that it is most essential both for writers and for students to know the causes from which all events spring and grow. But most writers are guilty of confusion in this matter, owing to their not observing the difference between a pretext and a cause, and between the beginning of a war and pretext for it.
I am therefore, as the circumstances themselves recall to my mind what I said on a previous occasion, compelled to repeat myself.
For of the events I just mentioned the first are pretexts, but the last — the plot against Eumenes and the murder of the envoys and other similar things that took place at the same time — constitute indeed evidently the actual beginning of the war between the Romans and Perseus and the consequent fall of the Macedonian power,
but not a single one of them was its cause. This will be evident from what I am about to say.
For just as I said that Philip, son of Amyntas, conceived and meant to carry out the war against <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Persia&groupId=871&placeId=1571">Persia</a>, but that it was Alexander who put his decision into execution; so now I maintain that Philip, son of Demetrius, first conceived the notion of entering on the last war against <a class="linkToPlace" target="_blank" href="/place?placename=Rome&groupId=935&placeId=1669">Rome</a>, and had prepared everything for the purpose, but on his decease Perseus was the executor of the design.
Now if one of these things is true, the other error also is evident. It is not surely possible that the causes of a war can be subsequent to the death of the man who decided on it and purposed to make it; and this is what other writers maintain; for all the things they mention are subsequent to the death of Philip.
Walbank Commentary